Case
Examples
Avoiding Disqualification
Don and Carol owned a home as joint tenants worth
$500,000 and a $90,000 bank account. Don became a Medi-Cal beneficiary
6 months ago when he suffered a stroke that paralyzed most of his
body. When his wife filled out the Medi-Cal application, she did
not indicate Don’s intent to return home since Don was so
severely disabled and the doctors told her that Don would never
recover. This had no impact on Don’s eligibility however,
because the house was an exempt asset since Carol lived there and
the $90,000 was exempt as the Community Spouse Resource Allowance
(CSRA). However, when Carol died suddenly, without a will, Don
inherited the home and the money in the bank. This disqualified
him from Medi-Cal and he was stuck paying for his own medical care.
To top things off, the skilled nursing facility charged Don more
than they had charged him when he was receiving Medi-Cal benefits
because he was now paying at the “private pay” rate
and not the lower Medi-Cal rate.
Don would still be receiving Medi-Cal benefits
today if Carol had consulted an elder law attorney. An elder law
attorney would
have told Carol to make sure that she checked the box that expressed
Don's intent to return home on Don’s Medi-Cal application,
which would have been permissible even if Don could not return
home. If she had done this when Don first applied, or if Don or
someone on Don’s behalf had immediately notified the eligibility
worker of Don’s subjective intent to return home after his
wife died, the house would still have been considered an exempt
asset and the inheritance of the house alone would not have disqualified
him from receiving benefits. As for the $90,000 in the bank, which
would have been exempt as the CSRA while Carol was alive, and Carol's
one-half interest in the home, an elder law attorney would have
advised Carol at a minimum to record a document that would sever
the right of survivorship inherent in the joint tenancy by recording
a special document against the title of the home and to create
a will or living trust that left her one-half interest in the home
and all the money to their children, instead of to Don. This would
have prevented Don from inheriting the $90,000 that would now have
to be spent for Don’s nursing home care before he could reapply
for Medi-Cal. Had Carol followed the advice of an elder law attorney,
Don would still be receiving Medi-Cal benefits today and his eligibility
would not have been affected by the death of his wife. However,
additional Medi-Cal planning would be necessary to avoid the state’s
recovery claim against Don's one-half interest in the house after
his death.
For more information on Medi-Cal eligibility
click here.
Serving Fremont, Newark, Union City & Hayward,
California
Disclaimer: The
content of this website has been created by Kisner Law Firm for
general informational and advertising purposes only. No attorney-client
relationship is established between Kisner Law Firm and any reader
who views the contents of this website. The information provided
is only a general statement of the laws and regulations of California
and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, legal advice.
No one should rely on the information provided by this website
without first obtaining legal advice from an attorney in their
jurisdiction.
|