| The
following was updated on January 4, 2010. Federal legislation
will have a significant affect on Medi-Cal (i.e., Medicaid)
planning as described in this website, when the legislation
is made effective in California.
Status
of New Legislation
The
United States Congress passed the Deficit Reduction Act of
2005 (S. 1932) (hereinafter the "ACT" or the "DRA")
that was signed into law by President Bush on February 8,
2006.
As
of September 29, 2008, the State of California passed statutes
(see SB483)
but not yet the necessary regulations to put any substantial
part of the DRA into effect in California. Therefore, California
is still following the laws and regulations that were in effect
before the DRA was signed into law by President Bush and SB483
was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger. Since the California
Department of Health Care Services has not yet published any
proposed regulations for the implementation of the DRA, it
is not likely that such regulations and most of the DRA will
be effective in California before late 2010.
The
provisions of SB 483 will not be effective until the regulations
are filed with the Secretary of State of California, which
should take a while. Such provisions will not be retroactive.
The
following is a summary of the salient provisions of the DRA.
Please note that any transactions made before the date
of enactment would be treated under existing Medicaid law
(except for Section 6014 of the ACT regarding home equity).
1.
Lengthening Look-Back Period (Sec. 6011 (A))
Section
6011 (a) would make the look-back period 60 months for all
transfers (outright transfers as well as transfers to and
from certain Trusts).
2.
Change In Beginning Date For Period Of Ineligibility (Sec.
6011(B))
Section
6011(b)(2) adds a new clause in the case of a transfer of
assets made on or after the date of enactment of the ACT,
providing that the beginning date for the period of ineligibility
is the first day of a month during or after which assets have
been transferred for less than fair market value, or
the date on which the individual is eligible for medical assistance
under the State plan and would otherwise be receiving institutional
level care based on an approved application for such care
but for the application of the penalty period, whichever
is later , and which does not occur during any other period
of ineligibility.
Section
6011(b)(1) retains current law in the case of a transfer of
assets made before the date of enactment of the ACT, such
that the beginning date for the period of ineligibility is
the first day of the first month during or after which assets
have been transferred for less than fair market value and
which does not occur in any other periods of ineligibility.
3.
Disclosure and Treatment of Annuities (Sec. 6012)
Disclosure
and Notice (Section 6012(a)). Section 1917 of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396p) is amended by re-designating
subsection (e) as subsection (f) and adding a new subsection
(e). For purposes of being eligible for long term care services
under Medicaid, the applicant or his or her spouse must disclose
any interest in an annuity (or similar financial instrument
that may be specified by the Secretary).
Such
application or recertification form shall include a statement
that the State becomes a remainder beneficiary under such
annuity or similar financial instrument. Also, the State shall
notify the issuer of the annuity of the right of the State
to be a preferred remainder beneficiary in the annuity.
The
change in the Annuity rules shall apply to transactions (including
the purchase
of an annuity) occurring on or after the date of the enactment
of the ACT (Sec. 6012(d)).
Please
refer to SB483
for the new laws regarding annuities.
4.
Disqualification for Long-Term Care Assistance for Individuals
with Substantial Home Equity (Sec. 6014)
Section
6014 provides for a denial of benefits for an individual who
has equity in a home that exceeds $500,000. It allows states
to increase the $500,000 limit to an amount not greater than
$750,000, which California SB483 does do. Starting December
31, 2011, such limit will be increased by changes in the consumer
price index.
The
change in the Medicaid eligibility rules as to Substantial
Home Equity shall apply to individuals whose eligibility is
based upon a Medicaid application filed on or after January
1, 2006 (Sec. 6014(b)).
Under
SB483, "equity interest" means the lesser
of the following:
(1)
The assessed value of the principal residence determined under
the most recent tax assessment, less any encumbrances of record.
(2)
The appraised value of the principal residence determined
by a qualified real estate appraiser who has been retained
by the applicant or beneficiary, less any encumbrances of
record.
Under
SB483 this equity limit does not apply to an individual if
any of the following circumstances exist:
(1)
The spouse of the individual or the individual's child, who
is under 21 years of age, or who is blind or who is disabled,
as defined by federal law, is lawfully residing in the individual'
s home.
(2)
The individual was determined eligible for medical assistance
for home and facility care based on an application filed before
January 1, 2006.
(3)
The Department of Health Care Services determines that ineligibility
for medical assistance for home and facility care would result
in demonstrated hardship on the individual. Demonstrated hardship
shall include, but need not be limited to, any of the following
circumstances:
(A) The individual was receiving home and facility care prior
to January 1, 2006.
(B) The individual has been determined to be eligible for
medical assistance for home and facility care based on an
application filed on or after January 1, 2006, and before
the date that regulations adopted pursuant to this section
are certified with the Secretary of State.
(C) The individual purchased and received benefits under a
long-term care insurance policy certified by the Department
of Health Care Services's California Partnership for Long-Term
Care Program.
(D) The individual's equity interest in the principal residence
exceeds the equity interest limit, but would not exceed the
equity interest limit if it had been increased by using the
quarterly House Price Index (HPI) for California, published
by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO).
(E) The applicant or beneficiary has been denied a home equity
loan by at least three lending institutions, or is ineligible
for any one Federal Housing Administration (FHA) approved
loan or reverse mortgage.
(F) The applicant or beneficiary, with good cause, is unable
to provide verification of the equity value.
(G) The applicant or beneficiary meets the undue hardship
criteria set by law.
5.
Impose Partial Months of Ineligibility (Sec. 6016 (A))
Section
6016(a) provides that States are no longer allowed to round
down the penalty period to the lowest whole number. Rather,
the penalty will, in essence, be a per diem penalty. For example,
if a transfer is made creating a transfer penalty period of
4.25 months, the applicant will be ineligible for 4 months
and 8 days.
6.
Multiple Transfers Into One Penalty Period (Sec. 6016(B))
Section
6016(b) adds a new paragraph (H) to 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(c)(1).
It applies to "multiple fractional transfers of assets
in more than 1 month for less than fair market value"
by the community spouse or institutionalized spouse after
the enactment date. The term "multiple fractional transfers"
is ambiguous but presumably it applies to transfers made in
successive months. For purposes of determining the period
of ineligibility, Paragraph (H) gives states discretion to
treat as one transfer, the total cumulative uncompensated
value of all assets transferred by the individual or spouse
during all months on or after the look-back date in 42 U.S.C.
§ 1396p(c)(1)(B). The period of ineligibility begins
on the earliest date which would apply under 42 U.S.C. §
1396p(c)(1)(D).
You
can get the full text of the Medicaid sections of the ACT
by clicking on Deficit
Reduction Act Text to go the the CANHR Website.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Is Medi-Cal Planning?
Medi-Cal
Planning is basically asset preservation. Many middle-income
families have lost their homes and life savings to the high
cost of nursing home care. But with Medi-Cal planning, those
families could have preserved their major assets and had their
nursing home bills paid for by Medi-Cal.
Medi-Cal
is California’s Medicaid health care payment program.
It is funded by the state and federal governments. The program
is designed to pay for the medical care of those California
residents who have very limited income or resources. However,
with some planning, middle-income persons can qualify as well.
Medi-Cal planning is complicated. There are many rules governing
which assets a person can keep, which ones can be transferred
and to whom, and how much can be transferred at one time.
If done incorrectly, it could lead to a period of ineligibility
or disqualification. That is why you should consult an elder
law attorney if you or a family member will be applying for,
or is considering applying for, Medi-Cal.
An
elder law attorney can help you through the application process
and design a plan for you that will preserve the maximum amount
of your assets and income. Some accountants and financial
planners try to provide the same services for their clients.
However, they may not know the intricacies of this area of
law and are not authorized to give legal advice. Also, the
spouse of a Medi-Cal beneficiary is limited as to the amount
of income and assets that he/she is allowed to keep. These
limits are referred to as the Community Spouse’s Resource
Allowance (CSRA) and Minimum Monthly Maintenance Needs Allowance
(MMMNA). The only way a person can increase these limits is
by obtaining an order from the Superior Court or from administrative
law judge. Unlike other financial advisors, an attorney can
represent you in the hearing held in the Superior court or
before an administrative law judge.
Learn
more about the realities and financial implications of long-term
care:
Contact
the Kisner Law Firm today and start planning for tomorrow.
Serving Fremont,
Newark, Union City & Hayward, California
Disclaimer:
The content of this website has been created by
Kisner Law Firm for general informational and advertising
purposes only. No attorney-client relationship is established
between Kisner Law Firm and any reader who views the contents
of this website. The information provided is only a general
statement of the laws and regulations of California and
is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, legal advice.
No one should rely on the information provided by this website
without first obtaining legal advice from an attorney in
their jurisdiction.
|